Sign in | Register now | Like us on FacebookLike Us | Follow us on TwitterFollow Us

Milwaukee's Daily Magazine for Sunday, May 19, 2013

Sun
Hi: 72
Lo: 58
Mon
Hi: 78
Lo: 60
Tue
Hi: 65
Lo: 56
Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com

Readers Blog

Quotas for Contractors

City of  Milwaukee Ordinance  370, which became effective this past January,  establishes  minimum quotas for minority contractors  bidding on city public works.  For example, for construction services 25%  of contracting dollars are set aside for specific groups of contractors,  including   12.05% for small businesses,  7.31% for   women-owned enterprises,  5.57% for African-Americans,  and .07 of one percent for Asian-Americans. (1)

But there is no quota for Hispanic businesses.  Yesterday the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Wisconsin  (HCCW) filed  a suit  in Milwaukee County Circuit  to invalidate the Ordinance.  City officials claim that Hispanic contractors have been so successful in winning city contracts  that no special set-aside provision was needed for them.  In a  survey of contractors  for the city,  about 7% of respondents claimed  that the city had discriminated against them on the basis of race.  The suit contends that the city has no compelling interest that would justify instituting a race-based quota system.

I suspect that if Ordinance 370 had included a generous quota for Hispanic-owned businesses,  the HCCW would not have sued, but the suit does not say so.  My own preference is that the city accept the lowest bid  received from a qualified contractor, regardless of the race, ethnicity or gender of the owner.  If the city accepts a higher bid in order to meet  a quota,  the taxpayers  are  paying the difference for the questionable privilege of  having the work done by a firm owned by one of the preferred groups.  As a city taxpayer  (for two properties), I  would rather have  the low bid accepted.  But that view, which prevailed for the first one hundred and fifty years of the city's existence, is no longer "politically correct."  

Some "affirmative action" quotas are justified as compensating disadvantaged groups for past discrimination.  Although  I agree that many minority and female  contractors  have experienced discrimination  during their professional lives,  there is no evidence that the City of Milwaukee has discriminated against anyone  in accepting the low bid  for city contracts.(2)   The city should not be responsible for compensating people for  the past acts of banks or other businesses.  Previous immigrant groups such as Jews, Italians and even Irish have all suffered discrimination in the past, but have achieved parity in the contracting field without the benefit of  any quotas.

My fearless forecast is  that the city will settle the HCCW suit by amending the Ordinance to provide a quota for Hispanic contractors. 

Gerald S Glazer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) "Hispanic group challenges minority hiring ordinance," in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, May 2, 2012, page 3B.

(2) I  worked on  evaluating bids for repair of  scattered-site public housing units at the Department of City Development from  1992 through early 1994, and  saw no evidence of discrimination.

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this and other user-submitted content do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of OnMilwaukee.com, its staff, its advertisers and/or its partners. This user-submitted content has not been checked for factual accuracy, and any photos uploaded have not be verified to be copyright-free. It is the user's responsibility to post text and/or photos that belong to that user and do not violate any copyright or intellectual property laws. If you feel this content is abusive, offensive or otherwise inappropriate, click to report and we will review this blog entry.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Talkbacks

solitarius | May 2, 2012 at 10:48 a.m. (report)

EXCELLENT post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, thank you.

What about the Cherokee, Sieks, Punjabs, Slaviks, Pashtuns, Ainu, etc? And anyway since when is a language group, i.e. Hispanic, disadvantaged? What about the Latins, French, Urdus, Hindi, Hebrews, Mandarins, Farsi, etc? This whole law is ridiculous and stupid.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 5.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your comment/review now 1 comment about this blog.
Post your comment/review now

Facebook comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.